User talk:Mcarling

Hello and welcome! Nice work in the physics area. Cheers! --mav 11:09 Jan 22, 2003 (UTC) see talk on 04 presSmith03 00:43, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Hi Mcarling :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.

Some links that may be of use:

Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers
Wikipedia:How to edit a page
Wikipedia:Village pump - ask questions you may have here, or leave a message on my talk page

You may want to look at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. What I've done for now is just put both people on the same page at James Gray for now. They can be further disambig-ged in future, if needed.

Thanks Dysprosia 06:41, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for the informative comment you left on my talk page. You may want to add some of it to Jim Jeffords. You can sign your name with ~~~~. Cheers, Jiang

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Merger Proposal

I have proposed that the Theodora B. Nathan article you created be merged with Theodora Nathalia Nathan, because the two articles appear to be about the same person.--TommyBoy 08:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read your comments on Talk:Theodora Nathalia Nathan regarding my proposed merger. As noted on both article Talk pages, I bungled an earlier attempt to merge the two pages. If possible, could you execute the merger? If you are able to execute the merger please remove the listing from proposed mergers under the June, 2006 header. --TommyBoy 20:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beating

a beating is beating, don't "hide"

Expecting apologies from you

In the arbitration case regarding Transnistria you told that I engaged in unwaranted personal attacks [1]. I am asking you either to prove what personal attack I made or to apologise from me.--MariusM 02:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I confused you with Dpotop, who made the personal attacks. Mcarling 06:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Airlines fleet

This is to inform that the Singapore Airlines fleet article has been nominated for deletion by Russavia. Please refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore Airlines fleet (2nd nomination) and weigh in your opinion if you wish. Thank you!--Huaiwei 06:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Airlines formal request for mediation

Hi, User:Russavia has recently started another request for mediation in relation to the Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines fleet articles, but have omitted your name from the list. In light of your major contributions to the said article(s), I have added your name to the involved parties list. If you agree to participate, please sign your acceptance on that page. Thank you. --Huaiwei (talk) 17:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Singapore Airlines.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel (talk) 11:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

United States Presidential Election, 2008

Some internal inconsistencies now exist on "United States Presidential Election, 2008" with respect to the electoral college results for Missouri and for the 2nd Congressional District of Nebraska. As the article was originally your baby, you may want to look into and harmonize the situation with the latest vote returns. Rammer (talk) 03:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed: Sitakunda Upazila

I found you at the now defunct League of copyeditors, and I am really hoping that you can help the article. The article failed an FAC mostly because of irregularities in citation format. But, it also needs a brush up on the copy and a proof reading job. Sorry for dropping in uninvited, but would you consider helping it, please? Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 00:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SingaporeSubmarineRescueShipMVSwiftRescue.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SingaporeSubmarineRescueShipMVSwiftRescue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 03:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: www.urcity.com/survey/index.php?user=61668218.

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

Proposed merge involving Republican Primary articles.

An article that you have been involved in editing, Republican Party presidential candidates, 2012, has been proposed for a merge with Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Bornholm (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 21:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stanley Marathon

The article Stanley Marathon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk) 06:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You should be aware that you are now at three reverts in 24 hours at Falkland Islands. Note that any further reverts may result in your being reported and blocked for edit warring. Note that it is possible in some circumstances to be blocked for edit warring even if you don't violate the three-revert rule. Kahastok talk 10:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Region Line

You're right. ERL has to do with Changi Depot and will be electrified by third rail. So this is the image link you trying to mention: http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/91/416898692.jpg Sni56996 (talk) 09:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same document, but I linked to a version without all the highlighting. You should not be so quick to assume that something is unknown just because you don't know it -- especially after having been given a link to a good source, whether you are having problems following the link or not. Mcarling (talk) 09:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fine and sorry for that ... Sni56996 (talk) 09:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. Thanks for all the good work you've done on the article this year. Your youthful exuberance is appreciated. Mcarling (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Anyway, good job on improving the Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) article and etc. I appreciate your work all this while. Sni56996 (talk) 05:08, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Integrated electric propulsion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Acoustic, Hull and Waterjet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political prisoners and detainees

Category:Political prisoners and detainees (and Category:Political prisoners and detainees of Russia), which you created, have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 11:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allergic to "talk"?

Are you allergic to talk pages or just really like reverting other people's work? LCS is the class, which has two variants. --Sam (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dated statements

You may want a look at Wikipedia:As of, Category:Temporal templates and Wikipedia:Template_messages/Cleanup#Time-sensitive Le Deluge (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

North Autobahn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

T C N7JM 20:34, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hi Mcarling, I just wanted to let you know that I have granted the reviewer userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, please contact me and I will remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Indian Premier League

Hi, thanks for revewing the pending edits on that page but unfortunately those edits you accepted were clearly vandalism, first one and second one. I hope you consider this mistake and also to look for vandalism when you review articles. Anyway, happy editing. Tolly 4 bolly 14:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mcarling. You have new messages at Tolly4bolly's talk page.
Message added 18:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tolly 4 bolly 18:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerusalem Road 16, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yisrael Katz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plumbat/Plumbatt

Hi. I redirected your article to the one that already existed at a different spelling but didn't transfer across any additional information that might be in yours. I thought it would be better for you to do that as you are familiar with the subject. Deb (talk) 11:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:CFredkin

Hi there - I see you've encountered issues with User:CFredkin, as I have just found in the article on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Perhaps you'd like to have a look and comment on the discussion. Cheers, Wik idea 17:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikidea and Mcarling: Also I need you guys with real experience to take over here [3]. This is the part where we can actually do something about this, and I'll support you who are much more experienced than I. Thank you! — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 23:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regard the MacBook Pro table

Hey there, I just saw the recent edit you've made on the MacBook Pro article and was wondering if the separation is necessary? Since the Early 2015 and Mid 2015 model only included 13" and 15" respectively, wouldn't it make the table easier to read with both of them merged into one column, like previously? Thanks — AYTK (talk) 21:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Web Host

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mcarling (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block for 198.8.80.0/20 but this host or IP is not a web host. M Carling 00:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address reverses to "Total Server Solutions". You claim it's not a host, but the IPWHOIS indicates otherwise. I want to be clear, this decline is a request for you to clarify your statement; other admins won't hold it against you. We'd just like you to explain why you think it's not a web host but IPWHOIS thinks it is indeed a server (and, likely, a webhost). Yamla (talk) 02:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mcarling (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why Wikipedia matched me to that block of IP addresses. I'm just an ordinary user connected using CenturyLink DSL. Anyway, I'm no longer blocked so, for now, this is resolved. M Carling 02:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Good to hear you're no longer blocked - nothing more to do here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mcarling. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mcarling. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Senatorial constituencies of Zimbabwe

The article Senatorial constituencies of Zimbabwe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is a single sentence, which is already stated in Senate of Zimbabwe. There is no reason for this to be a separate article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 05:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for openion

Article Legitimacy (criminal law) has been requested to be moved to Legitimacy (law) requesting your openion at Talk:Legitimacy_(criminal_law)

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar (talk) 05:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mcarling. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mcarling. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Mcarling! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law

Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, Nemo 21:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashdod Interchange

The article Ashdod Interchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, unsourced since 2013

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Scott Burley (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Neal Boortz

Neal Boortz has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]